Bergoglio has no magisterial authority. Those five Dubia questions are to be answered by the Pope, and Bergoglio is not now and never has been the Pope. Even Bergoglio himself testifies to his own criminal status as Antipope by “cleverly” (he thinks) refusing to answer simple questions submitted to him “as Pope”.
This is a GREAT POINT. Perhaps even more compelling than the fact that Bergoglio refuses to wear the Papal regalia, refuses to live in the Apostolic Palace or even to vacation in Castel Gondolfo, that he refers to himself as “Bishop of Rome”, that he explicitly stated that he would never make any “ex-cathedra” proclamations, that he waves at people, but doesn’t bless them, and has refused on multiple occasions to impart the Apostolic Blessing, and more. Perhaps my favorite was when he said, “Perhaps I will be the one to schism The Church.” Indeed. And since the Pope is in his person the Principal of Unity and Standard of Schism, it is ONTOLOGICALLY IMPOSSIBLE for the Pope to “schism The Church” because the Pope cannot, BY SIMPLE LOGICAL DEFINITION be in schism from himself. The Pope CANNOT BE a living incarnation of a violation of the Law of Non-contradiction – being simultaneously a thing AND its negation – in the case of the Papacy, both the Principal of Unity AND a vector of schism. This is just one more undeniable proof that Jorge Bergoglio is nothing more than an apostate Bishop.