That time St. Bernard of Clairvaux singlehandedly exposed Antipopes “morally unanimously accepted” by the College of Cardinals and restore

That time St. Bernard of Clairvaux singlehandedly exposed Antipopes “morally unanimously accepted” by the College of Cardinals and restored the True Pope. Thank God manly

“The fact that Ratzinger may have subjectively believed that he abdicated from the Papacy does not affect the nullity of the Renunciation”

Pope Benedict’s purported resignation was not only invalid, but very likely invalid for multiple reasons. https://nonvenipacem.org/2024/08/11/the-fact-that-ratzinger-may-have-subjectively-believed-that-he-abdicated-from-the-papacy-does-not-affect-the-nullity-of-the-renunciation/

What do you think of the munus vs. ministerium argument that Benedict XVI did not truly resign?

BXVI ‘resignation’ invalid multiple reasons The Resignation of Benedict XVI, due to the procedural defects and the canonical monstrum that it produced [of two apparent “popes”], is

Archbishop Viganò: Bergoglio is an ‘anti-Pope,’ Benedict’s resignation was ‘certainly invalid’

Vigano makes several excellent points in this statement.: -A holy Pope would/will declare Vatican II a failed council and declare it null -A holy Pope

1 16 17 18 19 20 91